{
    "0": {
        "webcast_id": "3634516_03112021",
        "hearing_date": "2021-11-03 00:00:00",
        "hearing_title": "L.B. v. Hungary (no. 36345\/16)",
        "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing",
        "appno": "36345\/16",
        "case_id": "001-223675",
        "case_name": "CASE OF L.B. v. HUNGARY",
        "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-223675",
        "type": "GRANDCHAMBER",
        "typedescription": 15,
        "document_date": "2023-03-09 00:00:00",
        "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG",
        "importance": 1,
        "court": "8",
        "issue": "Act no. XCII of 2003 on Tax Administration ; 2006 amendment of the 2003 Tax Administration Act ; Section 26 (2) of the Constitutional Court Act ; Act CXII of 2011 in the right to informational self-determination and freedom of information ; Act no. CL of 2017 (2017 Tax Administration Act)",
        "represented_by": "KISS D. ; KARSAI D.",
        "respondent": "HUN",
        "articles": "35;35-3-a;8;8-1;8-2;41",
        "strasbourg_caselaw": "A. v. Norway, no. 28070\/06, \u00a7 64, 9 April 2009;Alkaya v. Turkey, no. 42811\/06, 9 October 2012;Anchev v. Bulgaria (dec.), nos. 38334\/08 and 68242\/16, 5 December 2017;Animal Defenders International v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 48876\/08, ECHR 2013;Armonien\u0117 v. Lithuania, no. 36919\/02, \u00a7 42, 25 November 2008;Axel Springer AG v. Germany [GC], no. 39954\/08, 7 February 2012;Big Brother Watch and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 58170\/13 and 2 others, 25 May 2021;Biriuk v. Lithuania, no. 23373\/03, \u00a7 43, 25 November 2008;Cemalettin Canl\u0131 v. Turkey, no. 22427\/04, 18 November 2008;Centrum f\u00f6r r\u00e4ttvisa v. Sweden [GC], no. 35252\/08, \u00a7 151, 25 May 2021;Correia de Matos v. Portugal [GC], no. 56402\/12, \u00a7 117, 4 April 2018;Delfi AS v. Estonia [GC], no. 64569\/09, ECHR 2015;Denis and Irvine v. Belgium [GC], nos. 62819\/17 and 63921\/17, \u00a7 98, 1 June 2021;Editorial Board of Pravoye Delo and Shtekel v. Ukraine, no. 33014\/05, \u00a7 63, ECHR 2011 (extracts);G.S.B. v. Switzerland, no. 28601\/11, \u00a7 93, 22 December 2015;Karabeyo\u011flu v. Turkey, no. 30083\/10, \u00a7 118, 7 June 2016;Khadija Ismayilova v. Azerbaijan, nos. 65286\/13 and 57270\/14, \u00a7 147-49, 10 January 2019;Khelili v. Switzerland, no. 16188\/07, \u00a7 64, 18 October 2011;L.B. v. Hungary, no. 36345\/16, \u00a7 16, 12 January 2021;Leki\u0107 v. Slovenia [GC], no. 36480\/07, \u00a7 108, 11 December 2018;Leyla \u015eahin v. Turkey [GC], no. 44774\/98, \u00a7 99, ECHR 2005-XI;Lustig-Prean and Beckett v. the United Kingdom, nos. 31417\/96 and 32377\/96, \u00a7 82, 27 September 1999;M.A. v. Denmark [GC], no. 6697\/18, 9 July 2021;M.L. and W.W. v. Germany, nos. 60798\/10 and 65599\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 99 and 106, 28 June 2018;M.S. v. Sweden, 27 August 1997, Reports 1997 I;Magyar Tartalomszolg\u00e1ltat\u00f3k Egyes\u00fclete and Index.hu Zrt v. Hungary, no. 22947\/13, 2 February 2016;Mendrei v. Hungary (dec.), no. 54927\/15, 19 June 2018;Merabishvili v. Georgia [GC], no. 72508\/13, \u00a7 297, 28 November 2017;O\u2019Keeffe v. Ireland [GC], no. 35810\/09, \u00a7 199, ECHR 2014;Parrillo v. Italy [GC], no. 46470\/11, \u00a7 163, ECHR 2015;Petkov and Others v. Bulgaria (dec.), nos. 77568\/01, 178\/02 and 505\/02, 4 December 2007;Pfeifer v. Austria, no. 12556\/03, \u00a7 35, 15 November 2007;Pihl v. Sweden (dec.), no. 74742\/14, 7 February 2017;Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341\/95, \u00a7 44, ECHR 2000 V;S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562\/04 and 30566\/04, ECHR 2008;S.H. and Others v. Austria [GC], no. 57813\/00, \u00a7 97, ECHR 2011;S.M. v. Croatia [GC], no. 60561\/14, \u00a7\u00a7 216-19, 25 June 2020;Samoylova v. Russia, no. 49108\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 100-01, 14 December 2021;Satakunnan Markkinap\u00f6rssi Oy and Satamedia Oy v. Finland [GC], no. 931\/13, 27 June 2017;Sidabras and D\u017eiautas v. Lithuania, nos. 55480\/00 and 59330\/00, ECHR 2004 VIII;Sinan I\u015f\u0131k v. Turkey, no. 21924\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 42-53, ECHR 2010;S\u00f5ro v. Estonia, no. 22588\/08, \u00a7 62, 3 September 2015;Strand Lobben and Others v. Norway [GC], no. 37283\/13, \u00a7 211, 10 September 2019;Surikov v. Ukraine, no. 42788\/06, \u00a7 89, 26 January 2017;Vav\u0159i\u010dka and Others v. the Czech Republic [GC], nos. 47621\/13 and 5 others, \u00a7 273, 8 April 2021;Vukota-Boji\u0107 v. Switzerland, no. 61838\/10, \u00a7 52, 18 October 2016;W\u0119grzynowski and Smolczewski v. Poland, no. 33846\/07, \u00a7 58, 16 July 2013;White v. Sweden, no. 42435\/02, \u00a7 26, 19 September 2006;Z v. Finland, 25 February 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 I;\u017ddanoka v. Latvia [GC], no. 58278\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 112-15, ECHR 2006 IV",
        "external_sources": "Sections 5 (b), (c), (d) and (e) of the Council of Europe Convention for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data",
        "conclusion": "Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)",
        "separate_opinion": "TRUE",
        "judges": null,
        "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0309JUD003634516"
    },
    "1": {
        "webcast_id": "3634516_03112021",
        "hearing_date": "2021-11-03 00:00:00",
        "hearing_title": "L.B. v. Hungary (no. 36345\/16)",
        "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing",
        "appno": "36345\/16",
        "case_id": "001-207132",
        "case_name": "CASE OF L.B. v. HUNGARY",
        "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-207132",
        "type": "CHAMBER",
        "typedescription": 15,
        "document_date": "2021-01-12 00:00:00",
        "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG",
        "importance": 3,
        "court": "7",
        "issue": "Section 55(3) and (5) of the Tax Administration Act ; Act CVII of 2011 on the right to informational self-determination of freedom and information (\u201cthe Data Protection Act\u201d)",
        "represented_by": "KISS D.B.",
        "respondent": "HUN",
        "articles": "8;8-1;8-2;35",
        "strasbourg_caselaw": "A.-M.V. v. Finland, no. 53251\/13, \u00a7 82, 23 March 2017;Alkaya v. Turkey, no. 42811\/06, 9 October 2012;Amann v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27798\/95, \u00a7 65, ECHR 2000 II;Animal Defenders International v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 48876\/08, \u00a7 110, ECHR 2013 (extracts);Axel Springer AG v. Germany [GC], no. 39954\/08, \u00a7 83, 7 February 2012;Delfi AS v. Estonia [GC], no. 64569\/09, \u00a7 117, ECHR 2015;Dickson v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 44362\/04, \u00a7 78, ECHR 2007 V;Dubsk\u00e1 and Krejzov\u00e1 v. the Czech Republic [GC], nos. 28859\/11 and 28473\/12, \u00a7 179, 15 November 2016;Egill Einarsson v. Iceland, no. 24703\/15, \u00a7 46, 7 November 2017;G.S.B. v. Switzerland, no. 28601\/11, \u00a7 90, 22 December 2015;James and Others v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1986, \u00a7 36, Series A no. 98;Leander v. Sweden, 26 March 1987, \u00a7 48, Series A no. 116;Lundvall v. Sweden, no. 10473\/83, Commission decision of 1 December 1985, Decisions and Reports (DR) 45, p. 131;M.L. and W.W. v. Germany, nos. 60798\/10 and 65599\/10, \u00a7 104, 28 June 2018;Magyar Helsinki Bizotts\u00e1g v. Hungary [GC], no. 18030\/11, \u00a7 194, 8 November 2016;Niemietz v. Germany, 16 December 1992, \u00a7 29, Series A no. 251 B;P.G. and J.H. v. the United Kingdom, no. 44787\/98, \u00a7 57, ECHR 2001 IX;Polyakh and Others v. Ukraine, nos. 58812\/15 and 4 others, \u00a7 293, 17 October 2019;Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341\/95, \u00a7 46, ECHR 2000 V;S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562\/04 and 30566\/04, ECHR 2008;S.H. and Others v. Austria [GC], no. 57813\/00, ECHR 2011).;\u0160antare and Labaz\u0146ikovs v. Latvia, no. 34148\/07, \u00a7 52, 31 March 2016;Satakunnan Markkinap\u00f6rssi Oy and Satamedia Oy v. Finland [GC], no. 931\/13, \u00a7\u00a7 136-37, 27 June 2017;Savva Terentyev v. Russia, no. 10692\/09, \u00a7 79, 28 August 2018;Smirnova v. Russia, nos. 46133\/99 and 48183\/99, \u00a7 95, ECHR 2003 IX (extracts);Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 65731\/01 and 65900\/01, \u00a7 52, ECHR 2006 VI;Tiba v. Romania, no. 36188\/09, \u00a7 21, 13 December 2016;Vallianatos and Others v. Greece [GC], nos. 29381\/09 and 32684\/09, \u00a7 94, ECHR 2013 (extracts);Von Hannover v. Germany (no. 2) [GC], nos. 40660\/08 and 60641\/08, \u00a7 110, ECHR 2012;Vukota-Boji\u0107 v. Switzerland, no. 61838\/10, \u00a7 52, 18 October 2016",
        "external_sources": "Council of Europe Convention for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data (\u201cthe Data Protection Convention\u201d)",
        "conclusion": "Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life)",
        "separate_opinion": "TRUE",
        "judges": "Branko Lubarda;Carlo Ranzoni;Yonko Grozev;Georges Ravarani",
        "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0112JUD003634516"
    },
    "2": {
        "webcast_id": "3634516_03112021",
        "hearing_date": "2021-11-03 00:00:00",
        "hearing_title": "L.B. v. Hungary (no. 36345\/16)",
        "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing",
        "appno": "36345\/16",
        "case_id": "001-178642",
        "case_name": "L.B. v. HUNGARY",
        "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-178642",
        "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES",
        "typedescription": 23,
        "document_date": "",
        "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG",
        "importance": 4,
        "court": "",
        "issue": "",
        "represented_by": "",
        "respondent": "HUN",
        "articles": "8;8-1",
        "strasbourg_caselaw": "",
        "external_sources": "",
        "conclusion": "Communicated",
        "separate_opinion": "",
        "judges": "",
        "ecli": ""
    },
    "3": {
        "webcast_id": "2438419_29092021",
        "hearing_date": "2021-09-29 00:00:00",
        "hearing_title": "H.F. and M.F. v. France and J.D. and A.D. v. France (nos. 24384\/19 and 44234\/20)",
        "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing",
        "appno": "24384\/19",
        "case_id": "001-219333",
        "case_name": "CASE OF H.F. AND OTHERS v. FRANCE",
        "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-219333",
        "type": "GRANDCHAMBER",
        "typedescription": 15,
        "document_date": "2022-09-14 00:00:00",
        "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG",
        "importance": 1,
        "court": "8",
        "issue": "Inter-ministerial instruction no. 5995\/SG of 23 February 2018 on \u201cProvisions to be made for minors on their return from areas of terrorist group operations (in particular the Syria-Iraq border area)\u201d",
        "represented_by": "DOS\u00c9 M.",
        "respondent": "FRA",
        "articles": "1;34;35;35-3-a;41;46;46-2;P4-3;P4-3-2",
        "strasbourg_caselaw": "Abdi Ibrahim v. Norway [GC], no. 15379\/16, \u00a7 180, 10 December 2021;Abdul Wahab Khan v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 11987\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 27-28, 28 January 2014;Airey v. Ireland, 9 October 1979, \u00a7\u00a7 24-25, Series A no. 32;Al-Dulimi and Montana Management Inc. v. Switzerland [GC], no. 5809\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 134 and 145-146, 21 June 2016;Al-Nashif v. Bulgaria, no. 50963\/99, \u00a7 123, 20 June 2002;Al-Saadoon and Mufdhi v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 61498\/08, \u00a7 88, 30 June 2009;Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 55721\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 131-142, ECHR 2011;Association \u201cRegele Mihai\u201d v. Romania, no. 26916\/95, Commission Decision of 4 September 1995;Association Innocence en Danger and Association Enfance et Partage v. France, nos. 15343\/15 and 16806\/15, \u00a7 130, 4 June 2020;Bankovi\u0107 and Others v. Belgium and Others (dec.) [GC], no. 52207\/99, \u00a7 59, ECHR 2001-XII;Beghal v. the United Kingdom, no. 4755\/16, \u00a7 88, 28 February 2019;Ble\u010di\u0107 v. Croatia [GC], no. 59532\/00, \u00a7 67, ECHR 2006 III;Budayeva and Others v. Russia, nos. 15339\/02 and 4 others, \u00a7\u00a7 134 and 135, ECHR 2008 (extracts);C.B. v. Germany, no. 22012\/93, Commission decision, 11 January 1994;Catan and Others v. the Republic of Moldova and Russia [GC], nos. 43370\/04 and 2 others, \u00a7 103, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin C\u00e2mpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 102, 103 and 110, ECHR 2014;Cyprus v. Turkey, Commission decision, \u00a7 8, 26 May 1975, no. 6780\/74;De Wilde, Ooms and Versyp v. Belgium (Article 50), 10 March 1972, \u00a7 22, Series A no. 14;Georgia v. Russia (II) [GC] (merits), no. 38263\/08, 21 January 2021;Ghoumid and Others v. France, nos. 52273\/16 and 4 others, 25 June 2020;Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, \u00a7 26, Series A no. 18;Gray v. Germany, no. 49278\/09, 22 May 2014;Grz\u0119da v. Poland [GC], no. 43572\/18, \u00a7 342, 15 March 2022;G\u00fczelyurtlu and Others v. Cyprus and Turkey [GC], no. 36925\/07, 29 January 2019;Habsburg-Lothringen v. Austria, no. 15344\/89, Commission Decision, 14 December 1989;Hanan v. Germany [GC], no. 4871\/16, \u00a7\u00a7 133-142, 16 February 2021;Hashemi and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos. 1480\/16 and 6 others, \u00a7 47, 13 January 2022;Hassan and Others v. France, nos. 46695\/10 and 54588\/10, \u00a7 39, 4 December 2014;Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 27765\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 52 and 53, ECHR 2012;Janowiec and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 55508\/07 and 29520\/09, \u00a7 213, ECHR 2013;K2 v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 42387\/13, 7 February 2017;Khan v. France, no. 12267\/16, \u00a7 74, 28 February 2019;Kurt v. Austria [GC], no. 62903\/15, \u00a7\u00a7 157 et seq., 15 June 2021;Lambert and Others v. France [GC], no. 46043\/14, ECHR 2015 (extracts);Leyla \u015eahin v. Turkey [GC], no. 44774\/98, \u00a7 152, ECHR 2005-XI;Lopes de Sousa Fernandes v. Portugal [GC], no. 56080\/13, \u00a7 216, 19 December 2017;M. and Others v. Italy and Bulgaria, no. 40020\/03, \u00a7 127, 31 July 2012;M.N. and Others v. Belgium (dec.) [GC], no. 3599\/18, 5 May 2020;Magyar Helsinki Bizotts\u00e1g v. Hungary [GC], no. 18030\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 118-125, 8 November 2016;Marangos v. Cyprus, no. 31106\/96, Commission decision of 20 May 1997;Marckx v. Belgium, 13 June 1979, \u00a7 31, Series A no. 31;Markovic and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 1398\/03, ECHR 2006-XIV;Mathieu-Mohin and Clerfayt v. Belgium, 2 March 1987, \u00a7 52, Series A no. 113;Mediterraneum joint venture and 10 other applications v. Italy (dec.), no. 351\/05, 29 April 2008;Medvedyev and Others v. France [GC], no. 3394\/03, \u00a7 81, ECHR 2010;Momcilovic v. Croatia (dec.), no. 59138\/00, 29 August 2002;Muhammad and Muhammad v. Romania [GC], no. 80982\/12, \u00a7\u00a7 122-201, 15 October 2020;N.D. and N.T. v. Spain [GC], nos. 8675\/15 and 8697\/15, \u00a7 171, 13 February 2020;Nada v. Switzerland [GC], no. 10593\/08, \u00a7 164, ECHR 2012;Naumov v. Albania (dec.), no. 10513\/03, 4 January 2005;Nessa and Others v. Finland (dec.), no. 31862\/02, 6 May 2003;Pi\u015fkin v. Turkey, no. 33399\/18, \u00a7 227, 15 December 2020;S. v. Germany, no. 11659\/85, Commission decision, 17 October 1986;Slivenko and Others v. Latvia (dec.) [GC], no. 48321\/99, \u00a7 77, ECHR 2002 II (extracts);Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, \u00a7 86, Series A no. 161;Tagayeva and Others v. Russia, nos. 26562\/07 and 6 others, \u00a7 481, 13 April 2017;Ukraine v. Russia (re Crimea) (dec.) [GC], nos. 20958\/14 and 38334\/18, \u00a7 344, 16 December 2020;Usmanov v. Russia, no. 43936\/18, \u00a7 54, 22 December 2020;Verein gegen Tierfabriken Schweiz (VgT) v. Switzerland (no. 2) [GC], no. 32772\/02, \u00a7 81, ECHR 2009;Victor-Emmanuel De Savoie v. Italy (striking out), no. 53360\/99, 24 April 2003;X and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 22457\/16, \u00a7 182 and 197, 2 February 2021",
        "external_sources": "Article 12 \u00a7 4 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR);United Nations Human Rights Committee\u2019s (UNCCPR) General Comment no. 27 on the Freedom of Movement under Article 12 of the ICCPR, adopted on 1 November 1999 (UN Documents CCPR\/C\/21\/Rev.1\/Add.9);Article 19 of the International Law Commission (ILC) Draft Articles on Diplomatic Protection and commentary;Vienna Convention on Consular Relations adopted on 24 April 1963;Article 13 \u00a7 2 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights;Article 12 \u00a7 2 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples\u2019 Rights;Article 10 of the International Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), adopted on 20 November 1989;Explanatory Report to Protocol No. 4 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, securing certain rights and freedoms other than those\nalready included in the Convention and in the first Protocol thereto (STE no. 46);Four Geneva Conventions of 1949;Rule 144 of the International Committee of the Red Cross study on Customary International Humanitarian Law;Report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism, following her visit to France from 14 to 23 May 2018 (A\/HRC\/40\/52\/Add.4, 8 May 2019);Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly and Committee of Ministers (PACE) Recommendation 2169 (2020), entitled \u201cInternational obligations concerning the repatriation of children from war and conflict zones\u201d, adopted on 30 January 2020;Reply to Recommendation 2169, adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 8 December 2020 (at the 1391st meeting of the Ministers\u2019 Deputies);PACE Resolution 2321 (2020) adopted on 30 January 2020;PACE Committee on Social Affairs, Health and Sustainable Development Declaration adopted on 16 March 2021;European Parliament Resolution on the rights of the child (2019\/2876 (RSP)), adopted on 26 November 2019;European Parliament Resolution on the Syrian conflict \u2013 10 years after the uprising (2021\/2576 (RSP)), adopted on 11 March 2021\n",
        "conclusion": "Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Locus standi;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione loci;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 3 of Protocol No. 4 - Prohibition of expulsion of nationals (Article 3 para. 2 of Protocol No. 4 - Enter own country);Respondent State to take individual measures (Article 46-2 - Individual measures);Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)",