SRC:Steel1943
TGT:BDD
VOT:1
RES:1
YEA:2013
DAT:23:13, 19 April 2013
TXT:'''Support''' as co-nom.

SRC:Cuchullain
TGT:BDD
VOT:1
RES:1
YEA:2013
DAT:01:04, 20 April 2013
TXT:'''Support''' as nominator.--

SRC:INeverCry
TGT:BDD
VOT:1
RES:1
YEA:2013
DAT:23:43, 19 April 2013
TXT:'''Support''' per noms.

SRC:Cncmaster
TGT:BDD
VOT:1
RES:1
YEA:2013
DAT:00:11, 20 April 2013
TXT:'''Support''' per noms. BDD is a strong contributor with thousands of edits and years of experience. I have no problem supporting.

SRC:Miniapolis
TGT:BDD
VOT:1
RES:1
YEA:2013
DAT:00:56, 20 April 2013
TXT:'''Support''', with great pleasure. I work with BDD at the [[WP:GOCE|Guild of Copy Editors]] (where we're both coordinators), and have seen their good work at RM and AfD. A fine addition to the admin corps.

SRC:Sven Manguard
TGT:BDD
VOT:1
RES:1
YEA:2013
DAT:01:53, 20 April 2013
TXT:'''Support''' There are plenty of important roles on this project, of which content creator is only one of them. BDD has done good work over a number of years. That his primary activity is not content creation is not of concern.

SRC:Ramaksoud2000
TGT:BDD
VOT:1
RES:1
YEA:2013
DAT:02:00, 20 April 2013
TXT:'''Support''' per noms. I don't see a reason not to.

SRC:RockMagnetist
TGT:BDD
VOT:1
RES:1
YEA:2013
DAT:02:18, 20 April 2013
TXT:'''Support'''  BDD already wields a broom pretty well, so why not formalize it? I'm not too concerned about the lack of in-depth experience in developing articles because he has contributed so much to the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors|Guild of Copy Editors]] backlog drives: as his [[User:BDD/Barnstars|his barnstars]] attest, he has often been on the leaderboard. We don't all need to take the same route to adminship. My only quibble is a very minor one - what's with all the edits to his user talk archives? I hope that he will keep any current discussions involving administration on his main talk page, so other editors can find them easily.

SRC:Carrite
TGT:BDD
VOT:1
RES:1
YEA:2013
DAT:02:22, 20 April 2013
TXT:'''Support''' barring a completely unexpected answer to pro-forma question 6 above. The heads up about the old [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:BDD&oldid=16988125 2005 User Page] is a good one; someone that "right on" at age 17 is certainly worthy of support after the better part of a decade of additional seasoning (sporting a clean block log and no indications of assholery over that time, unsurprisingly). Concerns about relative lack of content creation are misplaced; administrative functions are only tangential to content writing, which is the reason that some of the best writers are not administrators and some of the best administrators do little in the way of mainspace content creation. An excellent candidate.

SRC:Someguy1221
TGT:BDD
VOT:1
RES:1
YEA:2013
DAT:03:09, 20 April 2013
TXT:'''Support''' because I see no good reason not to.

SRC:Secret
TGT:BDD
VOT:1
RES:1
YEA:2013
DAT:03:18, 20 April 2013
TXT:'''Support''' if a qualified editor is asking for the tools to work on [[WP:RM|requested moves]], an area in which hardly any administrator is willing to touch, they should be given the tools pretty much by default.

SRC:Dennis Brown
TGT:BDD
VOT:1
RES:1
YEA:2013
DAT:03:20, 20 April 2013
TXT:'''Support''' - I've done a formal review on him previously, and considered nominating him myself, but wasn't sure if I could be around to do a fair job of it. I'm very comfortable handing him the extra tools. 

SRC:MJ94
TGT:BDD
VOT:1
RES:1
YEA:2013